ID 5003
FullText File
Title Alternative
「かつて地中に葬られ、忘れられていた巨人が動き出す」 : 『忘れられた巨人』を「ダブルクロス・メタファー」として書くイシグロの語りの技法
Authors
中嶋 彩佳
DOI
Journal Title
Bulletin of Organization for Cross-Curricular and Cross-Disciplinary Education
Publisher
和歌山大学クロスカル教育機構
ISSN
24336130
NCID
AA12815903
Volume
4
Start Page
50
End Page
69
Order
06
Published Date
2023-03-31
Language
eng
Docuemnt Type
論文
Keywords
カズオ・イシグロ
『忘れられた巨人』
記憶
忘却
ダブルクロス・メタファー
Keywords Alternative
Kazuo Ishiguro
The Buried Giant
memory
forgetting
double-cross metaphors
Abstract Alternative
Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Buried Giant (2015) has been considered a radical departure from his previous six novels in two respects: first, the use of fantastical or legendary motifs drawn from Arthurian literature or fantasy novels, and second, the use of a third-person narrator. However, previous studies have only focused on the first aspect and ignored the second one, or Ishiguro’s narrative techniques. This study explores the two experiments in The Buried Giant in order to demonstrate how they are employed by Ishiguro to address the novel’s themes, such as memories, forgetting, and traumas of an individual and a community, as well as to write the novel as a “double-cross metaphor,” which is a means to pretend “it [is] a metaphor for something else when it [is] actually the thing it actually was.” While the novel focuses on a historical fact, namely strained relations between the Britons and Saxons, Ishiguro dilutes the historical concreteness of medieval Britain with supernatural elements, which allows the novel to be read metaphorically as a fable about strife between ethnic, religious, or national communities in the contemporary world. It can also be interpreted literally as part of Britain’s long history, even though it is an alternative history of a fantastical Britain peopled by dragons. This alternative British history echoes the actual history of cross-ethnic and cross-cultural encounters in the country, which encourages Ishiguro’s readers, especially his British readers, to realize the fallacy of believing that their country had been a homogeneous entity before it was flooded by immigrants.
Content Type
Departmental Bulletin Paper
Text Version
publisher