ID | 2821 |
FullText File | |
Title Alternative | Facially Neutral Policy and Disparate Impact: The Example of Pregnancy Discrimination
|
Authors | |
Self DOI | |
Journal Title |
The Wakayama economic review
|
ISSN | 04516222
|
NCID | AN00071425
|
Volume | 387
|
Start Page | 63
|
End Page | 79
|
Order | 04
|
Published Date | 2017-03-01
|
Language |
jpn
|
Keywords | 表面的中立政策
別異的効果
妊娠女性に対する差別
|
Keywords Alternative | Facially Neutral Policy
Disparate Impact
Pregnancy Discrimination
|
Abstract Alternative | This article analyzes pregnancy discrimination, including the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. case. The article explains the disparate treatment theory for pregnant women, the court's decisions, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's guidance, and the legislative history of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. It concludes that the disparate impact theory can mandate employers to provide accommodations to women affected by pregnancy.
|
Content Type |
Departmental Bulletin Paper
|
Text Version |
publisher
|